Interview with Jane Vincent, author of Implementing Cost-Effective Assistive Computer Technology Tuesday, Nov 8 2011 

For the last fourteen years, Jane Vincent has worked for the Center for Accessible Technology providing consultation to libraries on assistive technology acquisition and use throughout California, as well as evaluating Web site accessibility for businesses and organizations and performing assistive technology evaluations for individuals. She recently turned her expertise to writing Implementing Cost-Effective Assistive Computer Technology: A How-To-Do-It Manual for Librarians®, newly published this October. Here, Jane dispels some of the fictions surrounding assistive technology and shares her thoughts on how to implement assistive technology in libraries successfully.

· Assistive technology is usually thought of as equipment specifically for people with disabilities. Do you think this is accurate?

Not at all! I often say that assistive technology exists not because people have disabilities, but because computers are badly designed. Take the standard keyboard—the key markings usually take up about a fourth of the available space, instead of using large print that would make the keys easier to read by elders, children, and others. Inexpensive stick-on labels can greatly improve keyboard legibility. Another example is software that reads text aloud, which is a powerful tool for blind people and people with learning disabilities, but can also be helpful to beginning readers, ESL students, and anyone whose eyes are too tired for proofreading. And so on.

That said, many libraries will likely need to implement policies to ensure that the people who most need assistive technology to use computers will have priority access. Among several checklists and guides in the book is a series of questions to work through in setting policy guidelines relevant to the specific needs of your library. This will give staff a clear way to address issues such as when one patron might legitimately have a priority claim to a specific workstation over another, and when it would be appropriate to allow someone with a disability to reserve a computer for two hours instead of one.

· Libraries have sometimes seen “cost-effective” and “assistive technology” as being mutually incompatible. What’s the most important thing libraries can do to stretch their funds?

The best way — as with any service the library implements — is to find out and respond to the needs and preferences of the community. This can be done by conducting surveys and interviews with community members — patrons, of course, but also members of local organizations who provide services to people with disabilities, and other interested groups; in fact, developing an ongoing  partnership with these organizations can have a great deal of mutual benefit. Once you know what will be most relevant to your patrons, you can acquire and implement technology that will have the largest likelihood of being used regularly, rather than trying to guess what will work and ending up with equipment that just gets dusty.

Note that “cost-effective” doesn’t automatically equal “free.”  For example, there are many good assistive utilities already built into Windows and Macintosh operating systems, but even these have some cost.

At a minimum, they will probably require a discussion with IT staff to ensure that there is a way to provide access to them without compromising the integrity of security systems already on the computers. You’ll also need to check whether the assistive technologies you’re considering will work with your login system, databases, and mainstream applications. The book covers strategies for addressing these and other “hidden” issues.

· Once the technology is in place, how do you let patrons know it’s available?

You’ll want to use your usual channels, such as newsletters and Web sites, to reach not only your target audience, but also their friends, family members, and other supporters who can pass the word along. This is also a good example of why having partner organizations can help; these groups will have proven ways to reach their own memberships with your messages.

Before the patrons start coming, you also want to make sure your staff has had an appropriate level of training. They don’t need to know all the details of using the assistive technology, but they do need an overview of what the library has implemented and what it’s used for, along with an awareness of disability etiquette and how to refer people to patrons to services that the library can’t provide. The book includes several interviews with librarians about how they implemented assistive technology, and I’m particularly pleased with the one from the Ann Arbor District Library, where I had talked to several staff members at random, each of whom had obviously been well-trained in the assistive computer services that the library was newly providing.

· You’re maintaining a blog (at www.janevincent.com/iceact) to accompany the book. What’s the most exciting thing you’ve written about?

I’d have to say the Global Public Inclusive Infrastructure (GPII), which is working to create an entirely new model of assistive technology provision. Today, assistive technology in libraries is installed on individual computers, or maybe on a network; users often need to wait for specific computers to become available, and may then need to spend precious time reconfiguring settings to their preferences. In the future, with GPII, users will configure their preferences one time, and then by entering a code they can have their assistive technology come up fully configured to their needs. It will work from any Internet-connected device — not just computers, but also mobile devices, kiosks, and so on. I presented on GPII at the ALA conference in New Orleans, and was gratified to see the overwhelmingly positive response from librarians. The project’s website is www.gpii.org.

 

Feel free to contact Jane with your own questions—her email is jane [at] janevincent.com. Learn more about Implementing Cost-Effective Assistive Computer Technology: A How-To-Do-It Manual for Librarians® on the book’s Web page.

Interview with Laurie Thompson, author of The Medical Library Association’s Master Guide to Authoritative Information Resources in the Health Sciences Friday, Nov 4 2011 

Laurie Thompson, MLS, AHIP, brought over 30 years of health science library experience to her role as Editor-in-Chief of The Medical Library Association’s Master Guide to Authoritative Information Resources in the Health Sciences. She is the Assistant Vice President for Library Services at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and is active in the Medical Library Association, serving on its Board of Directors from 2006-2010. We asked Laurie to speak to us in the wake of a great review from CHOICE Magazine, which called the volume she edited “an important, useful tool that is both concise and reliable.” Here she explains how a discussion at an MLA Books Panel meeting turned into this comprehensive resource for health science librarians who must differentiate and select from among the  many resources available.

•  Why did you feel the need to create such a resource?

The concept for the book grew from a discussion during a Medical Library Association Books Panel meeting. We were talking about the demise of the long-time medical collection development tool, the Brandon-Hill lists. The Books Panel felt that MLA should try to fill that gap. I agreed to draft a scope and coverage statement for the Panel to use to recruit an editor. After the Panel approved the statement, I ended up volunteering to be the editor-in-chief.

•  Could you give an example of how a health sciences librarian could use this book?

There are many ways a health sciences librarian could use the Master Guide. It can be very useful to help build a new collection or a new subject area, such as when a new academic program is started, or a new VIP researcher is hired. It can be used to identify core resources to enhance an existing collection. As we face budget reductions, it can help identify items that should be kept. It could be used to identify a baseline collection for reports to accrediting agencies. Hospital librarians and public librarians can also use it to help build collections that are appropriate for a clinical collection or one that is used by consumers.

•  This 450-page guide that you edited is a huge collection of resources. What was your method for selecting and organizing resources, and what was the biggest challenge?

There were many challenges with this book, starting with selecting the topics for coverage. After trying to create and then discarding several lists of topics, I had one of those “aha” moments. In the health sciences, there is no better thesaurus than Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), produced by the National Library of Medicine. Since it is hierarchically arranged, I was able to use the Health Occupations and the Biological Sciences sections to identify the major categories. Even then, I received suggestions for additional topics, many of which I eventually included. Rather than arranging the topics alphabetically, I kept the organization from the MeSH Tree Structures, enhanced somewhat by the added suggestions.

I think the biggest challenge was keeping everything organized throughout the entire process. That would have been nearly impossible without the creation of an online submission and editing system that allowed me to virtually eliminate paper and emailing of files. I have to give big thanks to my staff at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center library for that. They also wrote the program to extract the records into the format that I needed to submit for the print manuscript. Along with managing the contributions, I had to keep track of all 108 contributors who were assigned the 213 individual topics. I managed all of that in a giant Excel spreadsheet. I received periodic reports from the database about which topics were complete and which contributors still had work to do.

I didn’t personally select the resources; I left that up to the judgment of the expert contributors. I gave them the guideline to select “the best 10 journals and the best 10 monographs and databases” in their subject areas. I also had lots of help with the initial editing from my three associate editors, Mori Lou Higa, Esther Carrigan, and Rajia Tobia.

•  What can you tell me about the contributors to the Master Guide and how you chose them?

The contributors were outstanding! Once I had the draft list of topics, I sent a request for volunteer contributors to many different medical library online discussion lists. I asked for them to tell me why they were qualified and how they would identify relevant resources. To be honest, I believed that I would never get contributors for many of the topics and that the project would die for lack of content. However, I was overwhelmed with contributors and had nearly all that I needed within just a few weeks.  I was amazed at the credentials they presented; in addition to being expert librarians, many of them had advanced degrees in all sorts of relevant areas. I believe there is only one non-librarian contributor: a physician who is married to one of the other contributors.

[Editors note: In fact, librarian-expert PhDs, RNs, MLISs, JDs, DVMs, BPharms, MDivs, MPAs, MDs, MSs, MALs, MHAs, M. Eds and RDs all contributed to finding resources for the Master Guide.]

•  As you have worked in different health sciences libraries over the years, what have you found to be the new or perennial challenges of the profession?

The single biggest challenge in my career has been the shift from the print library to one that is nearly all online, at least for the journal literature. It has affected everything we do. We have had to change both our technical and public services operations. We now have jobs we never would have dreamt of 30 years ago, like link checking or electronic resource management, that require an entirely different skill set than I learned in library school. Our clients now expect to use the library 24 hours a day, but many of them never come through our doors. The use of the physical library has changed.  Successfully adapting to these changes continues to be the biggest challenge we face as a profession.

 

Learn more about The Medical Library Association’s Master Guide to Authoritative Information Resources in the Health Sciences on the book’s Web page.

Reference Visionary Identifies Cutting-Edge Practices That Respond to Changing User Needs Thursday, Nov 3 2011 

Reference services are changing rapidly and dramatically. Marie L. Radford, the recent recipient of a $250,000 grant from the Institute of Museum and Library Services to study and improve virtual reference services, edits an invaluable collection exploring the dramatic changes in reference services occurring today and in the future. Leading the Reference Renaissance: Today’s Ideas for Tomorrow’s Cutting-Edge Services, features research, ideas, and methods from leaders in the field. From the press release:

“Bold transformations and visionary ideas characterize the current “renaissance” in  reference services, with still more dramatic changes to come. How can busy professionals stay abreast of the latest models of best practice and new evidence-based research? Award-winning editor and reference visionary Marie L. Radford brings together all of the essentials in her latest collection, Leading the Reference Renaissance: Today’s Ideas for Tomorrow’s Cutting-Edge Services, which Neal-Schuman will publish on December 30, 2011. “

Click here to find out more about this and other titles in Neal-Schuman’s press release database.

How-To-Do-It Tip: Developing Your LGBTQ Community’s Book Collection Wednesday, Nov 2 2011 

How-To-Do-It Tip

Would you be able to find and purchase appropriate gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, questioning young adult fiction if a community member donated money to help your library expand that collection? How would you know what was appropriate? Delivering great GLBT young adult fiction through your collection development plan means you will almost certainly need to justify their inclusion on the bookshelf. Fortunately, there are best practices to help you learn if there is a need for such a collection in the first place.

Today’s How-To-Do-It Tip comes from Serving Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Questioning Teens: A How-To-Do-It Manual written by Hillias J. Martin and James R. Murdock

Librarians are no strangers to fighting for equity of service for teens. Even today, many public libraries lack YA specialists and separate YA collections—this, despite the arrival of “echo boomers,” children of the baby boom generation who are themselves a demographic juggernaut. Inadequate service is especially unfortunate given that echo boomers are big readers, albeit at the same time as they text friends on their cell phones, download MP3s, and play video games. Publishers recognize this generation’s clout. So do booksellers, such as Borders and Barnes & Noble, which now prominently feature teen-only areas. But many libraries, given limited budgets, struggle to compete.

One way to calculate a rough estimate of how many queer teens live in your community is to visit the U.S. Census Bureau’s home page, www.census.gov, and find data tables for your town. You will need to drill down a bit, but eventually you should find a chart of age groups in your community. Add up the number of teenagers and multiply that result by 0.055—the product will be your rough estimate for how many queer teenagers live near you.

If you live in a small town and after doing this exercise discover that there are fewer than 100 queer teens out there, does that matter? No. The point of this exercise isn’t to compare numbers, or to value the needs of 100 teens less than the needs of 10,000 teens. The purpose is solely to show that there are queer teens in your town. For further proof, check out the yellow pages or go online to see if there are any queer community groups nearby. If there’s a PFLAG chapter or something similar, it clearly exists to fill a need. Also keep in mind that regardless of how many queer teens your calculations yield, straight teens also read LGBTQ books: to learn about their queer friends and family members, or simply to enjoy a well-written story.

-Excerpted from: Serving Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Questioning Teens: A How-To-Do-It Manual for Librarianspp. 65-66. ©2011 by Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc. All rights reserved.

Remember, there is a practical, new How-To-Do-It Tip from Neal-Schuman’s acclaimed How-To-Do-It Manuals® every two weeks. Make sure you never miss an update by subscribing to our blog feed or signing up for email delivery.

See our pictures from AASL and save Tuesday, Nov 1 2011 

Didn’t get a chance to stop by our booth at AASL? Check out our pictures below and save 10% on post-AASL orders. Use coupon code AASL11 at www.neal-schuman.com.

The "Teaching for Inquiry" Dream Team: Ruth Small, Marilyn Arnone, Pam Berger, and Barbara Stripling

 

Copyright Expert Rebecca Butler with her book, "Copyright for Teachers & Librarians in the 21st Century"

 

Denise Rehmke and Mary Jo Langhorne, authors of "Developing 21st Century Literacies"

 

Congratulations to Marie Radford Thursday, Oct 20 2011 

Marie Radford, author of the soon-to-be-released Leading the Reference Renaissance: Today’s Ideas for Tomorrow’s Cutting-Edge Services, is a recipient of  a $250,000 grant from the Institute of Museum and Library Services to study and improve virtual reference services. The project is entitled  “Cyber Synergy: Seeking Sustainability through Collaboration between Virtual Reference and Social Q&A Sites.” Radford and her co-recipient, Chirag Shah, are library and information science professors at the Rutgers School of Communication and Information.

 

Click here to learn more about the project and grant.

« Previous PageNext Page »