New Study Finds Student Research Skills Dismal Wednesday, Aug 31 2011
General Announcements and News 2:25 pm
“Just because you’ve grown up searching things in Google doesn’t mean you know how to use Google as a good research tool.” - Dr. Andrew D. Asher, Lead Research Anthropologist, ERIAL
The Ethnographic Research in Illinois Academic Libraries (ERIAL) project — a two-year series of studies conducted at Illinois Wesleyan, DePaul University, Northeastern Illinois University, and the University of Illinois — provides deep, subjective accounts of what students, librarians, and professors think of the library and one another at those institutions. While the full results of the study have not yet been published, an article in USA Today tackles some of “the sobering truths” that this research brings to light on how students view and use their campus libraries. Among them, students rarely ask librarians for help, even when they need it, students’ study habits are worse than thought, and, despite living in the Internet age, students are not skilled in internet searches.
Exploding the ‘Myth of the Digital Native’
The most alarming finding in the ERIAL studies was perhaps the most predictable: when it comes to finding and evaluating sources in the Internet age, students are downright lousy.
Only seven out of 30 students whom anthropologists observed at Illinois Wesleyan “conducted what a librarian might consider a reasonably well-executed search,” wrote Duke and Andrew Asher, an anthropology professor at Bucknell University, whom the Illinois consortium called in to lead the project.
Throughout the interviews, students mentioned Google 115 times — more than twice as many times as any other database. The prevalence of Google in student research is well-documented, but the Illinois researchers found something they did not expect: students were not very good at using Google. They were basically clueless about the logic underlying how the search engine organizes and displays its results. Consequently, the students did not know how to build a search that would return good sources. (For instance, limiting a search to news articles, or querying specific databases such as Google Book Search or Google Scholar.)
Duke and Asher said they were surprised by “the extent to which students appeared to lack even some of the most basic information literacy skills that we assumed they would have mastered in high school.” Even students who were high achievers in high school suffered from these deficiencies, Asher told Inside Higher Ed in an interview.
One of the most important problems cited in this study is the lack of training students have in how to use the library and basic research methods. That was an issue that inspired Neal-Schuman authors Arlene Rodda Quaratiello and Jane Devine, as the subtitle of their latest book The College Student’s Research Companion, Fifth Edition: Finding, Evaluating, and Citing the Resources You Need to Succeed demonstrates. Arlene Quaratiello, formerly an academic librarian who now teaches college English, and Jane Devine, a librarian and coauthor of Going Beyond Google: The Invisible Web in Learning and Teaching, saw this desperate need for guidance and today their resource has helped thousands of students fill the knowledge gaps detailed in the ERIAL research.
Look for the full results of the ERIAL study this fall when the resulting papers, Libraries and Student Culture: What We Now Know, are scheduled to be published by the American Library Association. And if the myth of the digital native has haunted your classroom or library, consider how Neal-Schuman’s full range of Information Literacy texts might help you improve your students’ research and information literacy skills.
Comments Off







